
The House Speaker Crisis and the Transformation of the Republican Party
The last two times members of the House of Representatives had to resort to multiple ballots to elect a House Speaker tell us a lot about the present crisis. Both times the crisis resulted from a major shift in US politics and either the rise of a new party or a major shift in the role of an already existing one.
1858-9
In 1858, the Republican Party, which had suddenly emerged, won a plurality in the House. It in effect replaced the Whig Party, which contained both pro and anti-slavery forces. But by 1858 the issue of slavery had become so hot that a party combining both sides of the issue could not survive. While the Republican Party was not overtly anti-slavery, it was the political center of anti-slavery elements. Because the Republicans didn’t have an outright majority, they could not elect their own Speaker without support from another party. This battle over House Speaker indicated a fundamental realignment in US politics. That realignment could only be settled by war – the US Civil War, and the Speaker battle was a warning of that coming Civil War.










Les pornographes de l’émotion s’en donnent à cœur joie. En tête de gondole, les magazines « people » et toute la cohorte des médias qui prétendent encore faire œuvre d’information auprès du grand public. Logique. Vendre du papier et faire du chiffre en termes d’audience, leurs motivations se résument à cette trivialité.
À force d’abstraction, certain·es inventent une géopolitique dénuée d’êtres humains, et semblent, en particulier, oublier les Ukrainien·nes bombardé·es, massacré·es, déporté·es, réfugié·es et aussi résistant·es… C’est pourtant le présent et l’avenir des populations ukrainiennes qui devraient être au centre des politiques posées par le crime d’agression.

On April 10 the World Bank updated its GDP prognosis for Ukraine to state that the Russian invasion was to shrink Ukraine’s economy by 45% in 2022 alone.[1] But that is a very optimistic prognosis. As by March 29th, the country’s direct one-time losses due to the invasion already exceed $1 trillion. Even prior to the invasions Ukraine already was one of the poorest and most indebted countries in Europe. Current budgetary expenditure on arms, humanitarian needs, and medical needs of the wounded have grown exponentially. That is why the IMF has already